Vajrasky Kok added the comment: Here is the updated patch. I try to be conservative here, preserving the current behaviour.
Negative times is same as zero. Default value (which can be passed by omitting times) means unlimited. I did not change the signature "repeat(object [,times])" because the only suitable default value, in my opinion, is "repeat(object [,times=<unlimited>])" which is impossible at the moment. Well, let see what Raymond has anything to say about this. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file33681/fix_itertools_repeat_negative_number_means_0_v3.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19145> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
