New submission from July Tikhonov: This is not a real-world example, but it brokes some invariant (part of path must not contain separator):
>>> pathlib.PurePath('/a/b.c.d').with_suffix('///') PurePosixPath('/a/b.c///') >>> pathlib.PurePath('/a/b.c.d').with_suffix('/not/split/into/parts').parts ('/', 'a', 'b.c/not/split/into/parts') I think these cases should raise an error. I would also like to consider the following to be an error, since the argument of with_suffix() is not exactly a suffix: >>> PurePath('/a/b.c.d').with_suffix('e') PurePosixPath('/a/b.ce') but I'm far less sure in this case. ---------- components: Library (Lib) messages: 207185 nosy: july, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: pathlib.PurePath.with_suffix() allows creation of otherwise impossible paths versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20111> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com