Tim Peters added the comment: @vajrasky, I didn't close it just because "the usual suspects" haven't chimed in yet. That is, it's a pretty common kind of report, and these usually attract the same kinds of comments pointing to other regexp implementations. So leaving it to "the regexp person" (whoever that may be these days) to close it. But marked it as invalid so as not to give the OP false hope ;-)
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19994> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
