Richard Oudkerk added the comment:
> I appear to be somehow getting child processes where __main__.__file__ is
> set, but __main__.__spec__ is not.
That seems to be true for the __main__ module even when multiprocessing is not
involved. Running a file /tmp/foo.py containing
import sys
print(sys.modules['__main__'].__spec__, sys.modules['__main__'].__file__)
I get output
None /tmp/foo.py
I am confused by why you would ever want to load by module name rather than
file name. What problem would that fix? If the idea is just to support
importing a main module without a .py extension, isn't __file__ good enough?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19946>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
