Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > Regarding the first issue, I don't believe that the result will be as > readable (but I agree with you that it will be better).
Yes, perhaps performance of the dbm.dumb module is not worst this cost. Are you have any benchmarking results? The patch LGTM. > Should this be targeted for 3.5? I think yes. ---------- stage: -> commit review versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19385> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
