Gregory P. Smith added the comment: I do not think this is ready to live in the standard library.
I've left some comments on your patch review. Consider those for incorporation into the psutils project. wait_procs() implementation should live in the psutils module on PyPI with more iteration on its implementation happening there as it isn't ready yet. In general: We have too many APIs in the subprocess module. I want to avoid adding more unless they are a very clear improvement to ease of use of the module. More things with deadlock caveats similar to the existing Popen.wait() call are undesirable. ---------- nosy: +gregory.p.smith resolution: -> rejected stage: -> patch review status: open -> closed type: -> enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19843> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
