Mark Dickinson added the comment:

Bug identifying 0j and -0j fixed for Python 2.6 in revision 60483.

Martin, can this be backported to 2.5.2?  I'll assume not, unless I hear
otherwise from you.

----------
status: open -> pending

_____________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1678380>
_____________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to