New submission from Eli Bendersky: Following up from Issue #19673; The initial patch clarifies the use cases of pure vs. concrete paths a bit and adds explicit signatures for the path class constructors (moving the construction discussion under the parent class).
Also, IMHO an inheritance diagram from PEP 428 is very relevant and useful. Would you mind if I add a .png for the pathlib rst doc? ---------- assignee: eli.bendersky components: Documentation messages: 204477 nosy: eli.bendersky, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Clarifications for the documentation of pathlib type: enhancement versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19799> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com