New submission from Eli Bendersky:

Following up from Issue #19673; The initial patch clarifies the use cases of 
pure vs. concrete paths a bit and adds explicit signatures for the path class 
constructors (moving the construction discussion under the parent class).

Also, IMHO an inheritance diagram from PEP 428 is very relevant and useful. 
Would you mind if I add a .png for the pathlib rst doc?

----------
assignee: eli.bendersky
components: Documentation
messages: 204477
nosy: eli.bendersky, pitrou
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: patch review
status: open
title: Clarifications for the documentation of pathlib
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19799>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to