Gregory P. Smith added the comment:
adding {0,1,2} to fds_to_keep (populated from pass_fds) is indeed an alternate
approach. A variant of an alternate patch doing that attached.
This actually simplifies code. Is there anything this would hurt that i'm not
seeing?
I suppose it adds minor overhead to the fork_exec() call by passing more in and
lookups into the fds_to_keep list now that it will always contain at least 4
values instead of the previous 1. I doubt that is matters (I haven't measured
anything).
----------
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file32830/issue15798_alternate-pass_fds-gps01.diff
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15798>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
