STINNER Victor added the comment:

I added a new _PyUnicodeWriter_WriteASCIIString() function to reply to Serhiy's 
comment on Rietveld:
"Perhaps it will be worth to add a helper function or macros  
_PyUnicodeWriter_WriteTwoAsciiChars()?"

changeset:   87263:d1ca05428c38
user:        Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com>
date:        Tue Nov 19 12:54:53 2013 +0100
files:       Include/unicodeobject.h Objects/listobject.c 
Objects/unicodeobject.c Python/formatter_unicode.c
description:
Add _PyUnicodeWriter_WriteASCIIString() function

Using this function, there is no need to create temporary colon (": ") or sep 
(", ") strings, performances are a little better with the final commit.

Common platform:
Timer info: namespace(adjustable=False, 
implementation='clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)', monotonic=True, 
resolution=1e-09)
CFLAGS: -Wno-unused-result -Werror=declaration-after-statement -DNDEBUG -g 
-fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
Timer: time.perf_counter
Platform: Linux-3.9.4-200.fc18.x86_64-x86_64-with-fedora-18-Spherical_Cow
Python unicode implementation: PEP 393
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz
Bits: int=32, long=64, long long=64, size_t=64, void*=64

Platform of campaign pyaccu:
Python version: 3.4.0a4+ (default:99141ab08e21, Nov 19 2013, 13:10:27) [GCC 
4.7.2 20121109 (Red Hat 4.7.2-8)]
Timer precision: 39 ns
Date: 2013-11-19 13:10:28
SCM: hg revision=99141ab08e21 branch=default date="2013-11-19 12:59 +0100"

Platform of campaign writer:
Python version: 3.4.0a4+ (default:3a354b879d1f, Nov 19 2013, 13:08:42) [GCC 
4.7.2 20121109 (Red Hat 4.7.2-8)]
Timer precision: 46 ns
Date: 2013-11-19 13:09:20
SCM: hg revision=3a354b879d1f tag=tip branch=default date="2013-11-19 13:07 
+0100"

--------------------------------------+-------------+--------------
Tests                                 |      pyaccu |        writer
--------------------------------------+-------------+--------------
{"a": 1}                              |  613 ns (*) | 338 ns (-45%)
dict(zip("abc", range(3)))            | 1.05 us (*) | 640 ns (-39%)
{"%03d":"abc" for k in range(10)}     |  635 ns (*) | 447 ns (-30%)
{"%100d":"abc" for k in range(10)}    |  651 ns (*) | 424 ns (-35%)
{k:"a" for k in range(10**3)}         |  233 us (*) | 132 us (-44%)
{k:"abc" for k in range(10**3)}       |  251 us (*) | 154 us (-39%)
{"%100d":"abc" for k in range(10**3)} |  668 ns (*) | 412 ns (-38%)
{k:"a" for k in range(10**6)}         |  268 ms (*) | 158 ms (-41%)
{k:"abc" for k in range(10**6)}       |  276 ms (*) | 163 ms (-41%)
{"%100d":"abc" for k in range(10**6)} |  658 ns (*) | 422 ns (-36%)
--------------------------------------+-------------+--------------
Total                                 |  544 ms (*) | 321 ms (-41%)
--------------------------------------+-------------+--------------

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19646>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to