Brett Cannon added the comment: I agree with Victor: we should document that proper Feb 29/leap year support requires a specified year, else constantly accepting Feb 29 as valid would lead to more errors than fix.
---------- nosy: +brett.cannon _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19376> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
