Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Sorry for chiming in a bit late, but what's the rationale for including 100.64.0.0/10 in the "is_private" set, rather than *only* excluding it from the "is_global" set?
The rationale for RFC 6598 is precisely that 100.64.0.0/10 is *not* private in the common sense, so it would deserve a different treatment in the ipaddress module as well. ---------- nosy: +pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17400> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
