Eli Bendersky added the comment: On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Nick Coghlan <rep...@bugs.python.org>wrote:
> > Nick Coghlan added the comment: > > Right, the minimum change needed is to prefix it with an underscore, but if > it isn't actually needed for anything, we may as well remove it entirely. > Just to be clear - do we consider all non-prefixed-with-underscore attributes of classes in the stdlib part of the public API, even when they're explicitly undocumented? And while we're at it, all non-prefixed-with-underscore methods as well? I still consider this refactoring gratuitious at this point. The API is well defined by the documentation. All the rest is implementation details. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18990> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
