Tim Peters added the comment:

Doesn't look like 5cfd7b2eb994 is going to fix it :-(  So I'll revert it.  
Attaching the patch as blind.patch.  After that patch, is_alive() only looks at 
Thread data members, where ._is_stopped "is obviously" True, and ._tstate_lock 
"is obviously" None, both forced by threading.py's _after_fork() function.  No 
theory as to how that can be screwed up.

----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31659/blind.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18808>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to