Eli Bendersky added the comment: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org>wrote:
> > Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > > > The most natural approach is to have a special attribute set in the > module's global dict (for example: __REGRTEST_SUBPROCESS__ = True); > however, there's a slight problem with this approach - regrtest has to > import the module to see this attribute, and the module may do some work in > its top-level code (commonly, imports) that already needs to be done within > a subprocess. > > The main regrtest process can run auxilary child process which imports all > test modules and says main process which of them have > __REGRTEST_SUBPROCESS__=True. > > It will be even better if the main process runs child process for testing > all tests so when any test crashes it is possible to report this and > respawn child process to continue testing other tests. > Well, if we go *that* way, my initial proposal would be to just always run every test in a subprocess. Kind of what happens today with -jN, just also for -j1. Since most people, and I assume bots, run -jN anyway, they already see each test executed in a subprocess. Some folks didn't feel good about it because the stress testing "all in one process" provides is apparently desired. Your proposal complicates the flow significantly, IMHO. I'd just run each test in its own subprocess and be done with it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18906> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
