Charles-François Natali added the comment: > I've lost track -- who is waiting for whom? I reviewed the patch > selector-12.diff and received zero response AFAICT. (Maybe the email from > Rietveld didn't make it?)
I was on vacation, and then had to cope with many emails :-) I'll update the patch with your comments soon. > Maybe the main issue is that I would prefer if the selector classes were in a > separate module (selectors.py) than the low-level select/poll/etc. calls. I > think it makes sense if the selectors module *only* defines the high level > classes and not the messy low-level stuff, since an app shouldn't be using > both at the same time. I agree with Antoine (i.e. I think select is OK), but if it really bothers you, I can change it. I just don't want to do it twice :-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16853> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
