Guido van Rossum added the comment: Well aren't there other languages (Ruby, Coffeescript) that have the same syntax? How do they do it? (Haskell does it too, but I don't think we can learn from it -- but in Ruby and IIRC Coffeescsript it is syntactic sugar for a regular call.)
Heck, even Python's predecessor, ABC, used "f x" to mean "f(x)". It solved "a b + c" by giving function call binding the *tightest* possible priority though, interpreting it as (a b) + c, and hence (a(b)) + c", which would be no good for Nick's hope that "print x+1, y" can be made to mean print(x+1, y) -- ABC would interpret it as "(print(x)) + 1, y". Still, I'd like to hear about how Ruby/Coffee solve this. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18788> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
