New submission from R. David Murray:
In 2.7:
>>> import pdb
>>> from email import message_from_string as m
>>> x = m("To: me\nfrom: you\n\ntest\n")
>>> pdb.set_trace()
--Return--
> <stdin>(1)<module>()->None
(Pdb) print x
>From nobody Fri Aug 16 19:06:58 2013
To: me
from: you
test
In 3.4:
>>> import pdb
>>> from email import message_from_string as m
>>> x = m("To: me\nfrom: you\n\ntest\n")
>>> pdb.set_trace()
--Return--
> <stdin>(1)<module>()->None
(Pdb) print x
<email.message.Message object at 0xb707b92c>
Since the print command masks the print function, it is difficult (though
not impossible) to actually get the print representation of something:
(Pdb) print(str(x))
'To: me\nfrom: you\n\ntest\n'
(Pdb) not print(x)
To: me
from: you
test
True
Because print is a function rather than a statement in python3, it might be
better to just drop the print command from pdb. Someone working in Python3 is
likely to type "print(...)" at the python3 pdb command line and expect it to
work like the print function.
----------
components: Library (Lib)
keywords: easy
messages: 195439
nosy: r.david.murray
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: The pdb print command prints repr instead of str in python3
versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18764>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
