Matt McClure added the comment: Michael Foord <fuzzyman <at> voidspace.org.uk> writes: > On 2 Aug 2013, at 19:19, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis <at> pitrou.net> wrote: > > The patch is basically ready for commit, except for a possible doc > > addition, no? > > Looks to be the case, reading the patch it looks fine. I'm currently on > holiday until Monday. If anyone is motivated to do the docs too and > commit that would be great. Otherwise I'll get to it on my return.
It looks like the patch is based on what will become 3.4. Would backporting it to 2.7 be feasible? What's involved in doing so? I took a crack at the docs. I'm attaching an updated patch. ---------- nosy: +matthewlmclure _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11798> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
