Guido van Rossum added the comment: Hm. Then I prefer just calling the appropriate builtin, e.g. int().
--Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone) On Jun 21, 2013 6:08 PM, "Nick Coghlan" <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Nick Coghlan added the comment: > > Can I vote for something like "__builtin__" as the protocol, rather than > something entirely specific to serialisation? As in "return the most > appropriate builtin type with the same value"? Then a converter > ("operator.builtin"?) could coerce builtin subclasses to their base classes > by default, rather than needing to implement the protocol on every type. > > Such a design would need a PEP, of course. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue18264> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18264> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com