João Bernardo added the comment: > But it might be nice to be able to wait on multiple conditions at > once, assuming they are associated with the same lock. Maybe we could > have a static method
This could solve the waiting problem for the "thread", but also may keep the other Condition objs waiting -- and that may not be problem because I'm already using .notify_all() Probably this function have more use cases than my original idea, but is it simple to wait on several locks? It could be in the form: Condition.wait_for_any(cond_to_pred: dict|list, timeout=None) -> condition For cases when there's no need for a predicate function. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18078> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com