Meador Inge added the comment: > I don't think Serhiy's patch should be blocked by a larger issue. > I suppose you could rebase easily over his changes.
Where rebase=undo, sure. The changes for issue3132 are pretty extensive (the basic data structures are changed). And as mentioned in msg165892, msg188840, and msg125617 I have already proposed and implemented this optimization many months back. If we feel that this optimization is really critical, then I agree let's not hold it up and I will just work around it with my patch for issue3132. I don't see it as that critical, but I understand that the PEP 3118 changes are dragging on and this optimization might be important for some now. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14596> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
