Guido van Rossum added the comment: I thought about that but I like this version better because the super() code does not have to know the details of how to find the cell.
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Nick Coghlan added the comment: > > Guido, did you try combining your first patch (clearing the local var when > populating the cell) with your second patch (by only checking for a cell > when the local var is cleared rather than when it is populated)? > > It seems slightly more logical to me to have a cell fallback for the > "local ref is NULL" case than it does to special case "local ref is not > NULL". > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org <javascript:;>> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue17927> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17927> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
