Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: >From my multilingual experience I can say that priority queue is very rarely >used type of collections (but if it needed it is very usefull). On one hand, >Python stdlib already contains one such type, and this type will be good >enough in non-performance-critical applications. On other hand, a non-locked >implementation using heapq is trivial (just encapsulate a list inside a >class), no one will implement it wrong (if do not over-complicate the >interface). I don't see the need for yet one priority queue. The presence of >two very similar types in the stdlib will lead to confusion.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17834> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
