Georg Brandl added the comment: > I'm not sure that's correct, unless only Steven has ever contributed > to it. To be correct, you'd have to list all significant contributors.
Well, then add "and contributors" :) But we have quite a few files with such a header (one person), which would be wrong. > But still, the maintenance burden of per-file copyright headers > (including the need to bump dates now and then) is non-negligible and > doesn't seem worth the hassle. Agreed. For the OP, it's probably fine for Chromium to put a license header into their own copy of the file. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17514> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
