Raymond Hettinger added the comment: [Ned] > Isn't it still good form to mention object as a base class.
I don't think so. The classes look much cleaner without it. +1 from for removing (object) from most examples (except for the descriptor howto). [Terry] > The respective howto and examples authors should give their > OK for deleting '(object)' in case they are trying to keep > one text compatible across 2 and 3. I added the other two > to the nosy list. Thanks Terry. Yes, I would like to keep (object) in the text of the descriptor how-to. As you said, it keeps the text compatible. But also, the explicit inheritance from (object) is an aid to clarity in a document that needs to highlight that attribute access occurs in two forms, object.__getattribute__ and type.__getattribute__. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17351> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com