Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Code behaving as documented is not a bug for tracker purposes. Adding a parameter to allow new behavior is an enhancement for a future release.
Who is responsible for the invalid cookie. Pardon my ignorance, but if tornado re-sets the cookie, why cannot it read it the next time? If the existing test suite tests for CookieError for invalid cookies, writing tests for strict=False (return instead of CookieError) would be trivial. ---------- nosy: +terry.reedy stage: -> test needed type: behavior -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17340> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
