Stefan Krah added the comment:
Here's a proposal for an alternative without parameter docstrings and a
different DSL (see os_stat.c). I guess it's easiest to present my thoughts
in list form.
Changes and rationale:
======================
Split docstring into function header and rest
---------------------------------------------
- Since the docstrings aren't repeated, less vertical space is used.
- The main part of the docstring can go into a header file.
- It's (IMO) easier to compare the generated header (see OS_STAT_HEADER)
to the specification in the comment.
More formal DSL
---------------
This is my personal opinion: The existing DSL is fine for a configuration
file (think .hgrc), but I have trouble with it in the context of a C file.
Most importantly, I'm unable to take in the required information at a
single glance.
So I propose to make the structure of the specification explicit. For
me the result is more readable. Also, it's already pretty close to a formal
grammar and can be optionally condensed into single lines.
Logical grouping
----------------
The preprocessor comment, OS_STAT_HEADER and the os_stat() definition are
close together and fit on a single screen.
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29059/os_stat.c
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16612>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
