Mark Dickinson added the comment:
This is a feature request rather than a bug report; changing fields
accordingly.
Also, given the discussion leading to the rejection of issue 1074462, and the
fact that you can now use %f in strftime as an easy way to get consistent
output (issue 1158), I'm closing this as rejected.
>>> d = datetime.datetime(2013, 10, 11, 12, 34, 56, 0)
>>> d.strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f")
'2013-10-11 12:34:56.000000'
----------
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
type: behavior -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.2
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue17139>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
