Berker Peksag added the comment: Sorry for the delay and thanks for the suggestions Ezio and Nick.
> Given the lack of proper tests for iter_importers, wouldn't adding a > proper test that returns something useful, rather than testing only > with a non-existent module be better (this test could be kept, maybe > converted to an assertRaises)? I've added a test for iter_importers(). > (Note: There's a series of patches from Chris to move the walk_packages > test to where it belongs in test_pkgutil, but they won't be applied until > after the final 3.2 maintenance release has happened.) Thanks for the info. These patches are in issue 15376, issue 15358, issue 15403 and issue 15415, right? ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28923/issue16163_v3.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16163> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
