Chris Jerdonek added the comment: > Also, I'm of the opinion that we'll end up with a higher quality result doing > things by hand anyway.
Automation doesn't (and shouldn't) preclude careful review and modifications by hand. My point was that it seems like it might be able to get you, say, 80% of the way there (e.g. by deleting test_main(), determining which classes are called by test_main(), adding ", unittest.TestCase", creating stub classes that could be retained or deleted). Or at least provide some additional checks or info. There are nearly 400 test files using test_main(), no? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16748> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
