Ezio Melotti added the comment: > Well, the math.pow() doc could use a "seealso" pointing to the built-in > pow() function perhaps.
Pointing to ``**`` is probably better. I think that a simple note that mentions the ** operator and when it's better to use it (and possibly the limitations of math.pow) is enough. Anyone wants to suggest a specific wording? ---------- assignee: rhettinger -> resolution: invalid -> stage: -> needs patch type: behavior -> enhancement versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15438> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
