Guido van Rossum added the comment: Great, now check it in!
On Dec 2, 2007 6:01 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nick Coghlan added the comment: > > Posted v2 of the patch, which fixes the problem Guido noted, and > improved the tests to make sure __package__ is being set correctly. > There's also now an explicit test for using -m on a module inside a > package (which proved harder to write than I expected - it isn't easy to > fiddle with sys.path when the subprocess is running python with the -E > flag!). > > Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8852/pep_366_v2.diff > > > __________________________________ > Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue1487> > __________________________________ __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1487> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
