Robin Schreiber added the comment: I have updated the patch to work again with the current version of the _datetimemodule.
Regarding the suggestion of separating PEP3121 and PEP384. It might be true that datetime and other modules do not benefit directly from PEP 384, however it is still a fact that the stdlib modules should be seen as a set of reference modules, that are all implemented in a way that complies with the implementation fo the xxmodules. I have talked with Martin von Löwis about this, and as far as I understood him correctly he also sees the PEP384 refactoring applied to the whole stdlib as a nessecary "signal" to other developers to refactor their modules accordingly. Anyway I am planning to start to commit all of the open changes that I have created during my GSOC in the next few months. So a decision regarding this separation concern might be helpful. :-) ---------- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28274/_datetimemodule_pep3121-384_v3.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15390> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
