New submission from Chris Jerdonek: This issue is to define "PEP editor" (or "PEP editors") in PEP 1 before it is used in the document and to provide certain clarifying information.
In particular, PEP 1 should say whether editorship is an invitation-only status and/or how one becomes a PEP editor. It would also be good if it said (for transparency) how to go about seeing the current list of editors. There is also inconsistent singular/plural usage that I think would be good to clear up. Currently, in many places PEP 1 says "the PEP editor" (singular), so it's not clear if each PEP has its own editor, if there is a single PEP editor for all PEPs at any one time, or if it simply means "the PEP editor that happens to reply to an e-mail to p...@python.org". PEP 0 also has this issue because its introduction says, "[This] PEP contains the index of all Python Enhancement Proposals, known as PEPs. PEP numbers are assigned by the PEP Editor, and once assigned are never changed." ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 176678 nosy: Jeremy.Hylton, barry, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, goodger, ncoghlan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: define "PEP editor" in PEP 1 type: enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16581> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
