Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > - are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we > > forbid it instead? > > - I think it would be nice to reference the RFC number somewhere > > - not sure why you raise IOError on a bad URL; I would say ValueError is > > the right exception here > > > > I did that because that's what the old URLopener code does (ignoring POSTed > data and raising an > IOError). The comment is actually a 1:1 copy of the old code.
Ok. I think it's better to take a fresh start here :-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16423> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
