Ezio Melotti added the comment: The workaround is now documented. I'm still not sure if this should still be added, or if it should be closed as rejected now that the workaround is documented. A third option would be adding it as a recipe in the doc, given that the whole functions boils down to a single re.sub (the user can take care of picking the bytes/str regex depending on his input).
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8402> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
