Nadeem Vawda added the comment: > These were not idle questions. I wrote the patch, and I had to know > what behavior is correct.
Ah, sorry. I assumed you were going to submit a separate patch to fix the unconsumed_tail issues. > Here's the patch. It fixes potential memory bug (unconsumed_tail sets > to NULL in case of out of memory), resets the unconsumed_tail to b'' > after EOF, updates unconsumed_tail and unused_data in flush(). Did you perhaps forget to attach the patch? The only ones I see are those that you uploaded last week. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16350> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
