Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Your patch is trivial enough, I am OK to integrate it as is, but it would be nice to verify that we are not reintroducing this bug in the future.
I know that writing a the test will be far more difficult that writing the patch. You can try :). Anyway I am OK to integrate current patch as is. Looks simple enough. The comment in "run()" is a bit scary, and we could call "self.close()" twice, with this patch, or call extra code after "self.close()" is called. I don't know it that would be an issue, I am not familiarized enough with WSGI. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16220> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
