Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

[Django/Rietveld is erroring out for me when I try to reply there, so replying 
here]

On 2012/10/01 01:45:03, cvrebert wrote:
> Doc/library/functions.rst:636: arguments are given.  If *x* is a number, 
> return
> :meth:`x.__int__()
> How is "number-ness" determined? Are we just assuming anything with an 
> __int__()
> method is a number for purposes of explanation?

cvrebert, this patch has already been committed to 3.x.  Maybe open a new issue 
if you think the language can be improved further?  (Feel free to add me to the 
nosy list.)  This issue was originally focused more on updating just the 
signature line (along with any consequent changes to the text).

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16036>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to