Ezio Melotti added the comment: It doesn't necessary have to be limited to methods, anything duplicate might turn out to be a bug. If the script doesn't mix scopes there shouldn't be too many false positives, and if they are it shouldn't be a big deal if they are reported on the changed file by `make patchcheck`.
> I'm not sure if there is ever a use case for duplicate > method names. Is there? Nothing that can't be done in a more elegant way afaict. It might make sense for variables though, where you have e.g.: foo = do_something(x) foo = do_something_more(foo) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16079> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
