Eric Snow added the comment:
Wouldn't the following also start working (currently a NameError)?
class X:
def f(self):
print(f.__qualname__)
def g(self):
f(None)
X().f()
X().g()
How about this[1] (also currently a NameError):
class Outer:
class Inner:
class Worker:
pass
class InnerSubclass(Inner):
class Worker(Inner.Worker):
pass
I wouldn't mind the semantic change, but it would be a change nonetheless.
[1] See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2011-April/601605.html
----------
nosy: +eric.snow
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12370>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
