R. David Murray added the comment:

It looks to me like we (now, as of 67dc99a989cd) handle EINTR, so that the 
suggested caveat is no longer true.  Since the TTY example has also been 
explained as correct, I'm going to close this.  If I'm wrong about EINTR, 
someone (Antoine or Gregory, presumably) can reopen it...

----------
assignee: docs@python -> 
nosy: +gregory.p.smith, r.david.murray
resolution:  -> out of date
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1432343>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to