James added the comment: Sorry, I wasn't very clear. super() currently works by assuming that self is the first entry in f_localsplus, which is defeated, for example, by doing:
>>> class A: ... def f(self): ... del self ... super() ... >>> A().f() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<stdin>", line 4, in f SystemError: super(): arg[0] deleted >>> class B: ... def f(self): ... self = 1 ... super() ... >>> B().f() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<stdin>", line 4, in f TypeError: super(type, obj): obj must be an instance or subtype of type I don't know if this is the intended behaviour (in which case, my assertion that obj is a tuple should be replaced by just checking whether it is a tuple and raising an exception otherwise; and I suppose the super documentation should mention this caveat), or whether this should be fixed somehow. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15753> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
