Travis Oliphant added the comment: I have two issues with this patch:
1) I'm not sure it's that bad to need to use '%d' % long(obj) to ensure conversion to a long integer. 2) If this kind of auto-conversion is deemed useful, then the patch itself is rather complicated. I would re-factor so that the same code is not repeated once in the PyNumber_Check and again in the original PyLong_Check and else clauses. Simply check for PyNumber. Then, if not already an int or a long, convert to int first and then long if that creates an error. Then, excecute the two segments of code for int and long objects. ---------- nosy: +teoliphant _____________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1742669> _____________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
