Antoine Pitrou added the comment: + // in case init is called multiple times within one interpreter, + // we do not have to repeat all of the initialization
First, you shouldn't use C++-style comments ("//"). Second, I find this comment a bit weird. Even if init is called a second time, surely clear would have been called in-between, and therefore the module state has to be initialized again? Review comments from issue15653 also apply here. ---------- nosy: +loewis, pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15655> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com