Antoine Pitrou added the comment:

+    // in case init is called multiple times within one interpreter,
+    // we do not have to repeat all of the initialization

First, you shouldn't use C++-style comments ("//").
Second, I find this comment a bit weird. Even if init is called a second time, 
surely clear would have been called in-between, and therefore the module state 
has to be initialized again?

Review comments from issue15653 also apply here.

----------
nosy: +loewis, pitrou

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15655>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to