Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> added the comment: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Chris Jerdonek <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:> > Sure, if someone is open to reviewing it.
Yes, please go ahead. I can review it and I believe others should be able to as well. As a first short, I think, it may be a good idea to just replacing the short opt and long opt handling behavior and not dwell too much into argparse features (just to ascertain that we are not going through a new code-path. this I believe, may help assuage Ezio's concern a bit that regrtest.py lacks test and changes to them should be carefully done at this point in time in release). Or the other idea is you may submit the patch and if it is significant, it may go in early in 3.4 ---------- nosy: +orsenthil _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15302> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
