Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> added the comment: Why should the socket need closing if the connect fails? This seems a flawed contract; either connect() should work (in which case the socket will need closing when it's finished with) or it should fail, not connect and not require a close call (as it isn't connected). Could this be a problem with eventlet? One could argue that the leak is actually in whatever implements socket.connect in this case (presumably eventlet).
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15179> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
