Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: Given Antoine's other change to the build process to fix the bootstrapping problem, I'm OK with leaving it up to anyone hacking on _bootstrap.py to remember that they need to run make if they want the interpreter to see any of their changes.
Unlike the C accelerator cases, it's not possible for the two implementations to get out of sync on the buildbots, so running the tests twice would just be a convenience change for anyone hacking on _bootstrap.py rather than being needed for correctness. That said, if someone created a new issue and posted a patch to run the tests twice, I wouldn't object - a classic case of +0 :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14657> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
