Armin Rigo <ar...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment: fijal: while I agree with you, the limit for small ints has actually been pushed to 257 in recent CPythons. So it should still theoretically work --- of course, assuming a predictable CPU, which is wrong, and assuming a simple interpreter. (We can probably dig enough to find a timing issue even with CPython, and of course it's clear with any of the other Python interpreters out there.)
---------- nosy: +arigo _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15061> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
